RHEL, Centos, Fedora rpm 9.16.6

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RHEL, Centos, Fedora rpm 9.16.6

Bind-Users forum mailing list
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

https://www.five-ten-sg.com/mapper/bind contains links to the source
rpms, and build instructions.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHMEAREKADMWIQSuFMepaSkjWnTxQ5QvqPuaKVMWwQUCXz7EtRUcY2FybEBmaXZl
LXRlbi1zZy5jb20ACgkQL6j7milTFsHXUwCffZxEKWp/Ssbw7cXJaBUPbmFvN6IA
n27w8NdQ1K5MP3Y3lngDGTadE2N0
=KeXf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list

ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.


bind-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: RHEL, Centos, Fedora rpm 9.16.6

PGNet Dev
On 8/20/20 11:45 AM, Carl Byington via bind-users wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> https://www.five-ten-sg.com/mapper/bind contains links to the source
> rpms, and build instructions.

How/why are these^ generally different than the isc-maintained pkgs at

        https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/isc/bind/

?

I do understand atm the 'official' pkgs don't yet include the 9.16.6 build ... which, of course, is a _primary_ difference.

Are they otherwise unrelated?

_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list

ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.


bind-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: RHEL, Centos, Fedora rpm 9.16.6

Bind-Users forum mailing list
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On Thu, 2020-08-20 at 12:20 -0700, PGNet Dev wrote:
> Are they otherwise unrelated?

Mine are intended as an in-place replacement/update from the bind
versions in RHEL/Centos 7 and 8. The same file layout, etc. This is as
close as I can come to a hypothetical RHEL release of bind 9.16.

I believe the ISC versions install into a different path to avoid
clobbering the RHEL bind version.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHMEAREKADMWIQSuFMepaSkjWnTxQ5QvqPuaKVMWwQUCX1LJChUcY2FybEBmaXZl
LXRlbi1zZy5jb20ACgkQL6j7milTFsGs9QCfbLu97Z5dhUORW2BdBcVt0K47cLsA
nR3f6SHCRdnvSlRKknq7fKxoCu/J
=MyMD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list

ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.


bind-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users